Legal Opinion

Bird v. Belz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Atchison District Cowrt. ACTION brought by Belz against Bird, to recover a certain lot in the city of Atchison. The facts appear in Belz v. Bird, 31 Kas. 139, et seq., and in the opinion herein. Bird complains of the judgment rendered by the district court at the June Term, 1884, and. brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This case was in this court at the July term for 1883. (31 Kas. 139.) At that time, the judgment of the district court was reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion. Subsequently, a supplemental mandate was ordered by this court, directing that the taxes paid by the parties respectively be a lien upon the property as to priority, inversely in the order in which the taxes were levied and paid by the parties, and that the improvements made on the property, to wit, the fence erected by Bird in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kershaw v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  2. Corbin v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Belz v. BirdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Landon v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Russell v. HudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lundstrum v. BransonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Watkins v. JermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. New York Life Insurance v. SlentzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Gardner v. DuncanMississippi Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API