Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance v. Slentz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1937No. 33,345PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This was an action by the purchaser at foreclosure sale of an apartment building to recover the reasonable value of the use and occupancy of the property during an interval between the time the plaintiff purchaser was entitled to a sheriff’s deed and the time when such deed was executed.

Preliminary to a consideration of this case, it is necessary to state certain antecedent matters at some length:

Defendants owned four town lots in Wichita on which was situated a twenty-four-apartment building. Plaintiff held a mortgage on the property for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Manley v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Zimmerman v. RoseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Clark v. LaymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Union Central Life Insurance v. PletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. TittelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Pouquette v. O'BrienArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. New York Life Insurance v. SlentzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API