Legal Opinion
Natalizio v. City of Middletown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for violations of 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated October 29, 2001, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing their substantive due process claims.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
To succeed on their claims pursuant to 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiffs were required to establish the deprivation of a protectable property interest by one acting under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of MineolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Town of Orangetown v. MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Voorhis v. Warwick Valley Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Supan v. MichelfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Maio v. KralikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Alberti v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Trakis v. Manhattanville CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- SCRO, ANTHONY v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JORDAN-ELBRID, GE C.S.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.