Legal Opinion

Maio v. Kralik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 2009PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Dickerson, J.

Pursuant to a temporary order of protection, the plaintiff surrendered three handguns, three rifles, a shotgun, and shooting accessories that he owned to the Rockland County Sheriff’s Department (hereinafter the Sheriffs Department). When he subsequently returned to the Sheriffs Department to reclaim his property, he learned that it had been destroyed, purportedly in accordance with the applicable statutory scheme. The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and pursuant to 42 USC § 1983.

Here, we consider whether the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Holland v. City of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Hudson Valley Marine, Inc. v. Town of CortlandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Eckardt v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Rodgers v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Combs v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API