Legal Opinion
Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 24, 2006No. 05 CIV.3170 (MBM)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Louis R. Anemone sues the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) and individual defendants Peter S. Kalikow, Katherine N. Lapp, Gary J. Dellaverson, and Matthew D. Sansverie in their individual and official capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for violations of free speech and due process rights secured by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Anemone also asserts free speech and due process claims against all defendants under the New York State Constitution and a claim against defendant MTA under New…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Jackson v. NYS Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Gonzalez v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Phillips v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.