Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Sprigley v. Woodworth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauck, J.

The sole question, therefore, before us is whether or not the defendant, having found that the relator’s property was in a residential district, had power because of that fact to refuse her a permit to build a gasoline filling, station upon the lot in question. In Pritz v. Messer, 112 OS. 628, the Supreme Court sustained a zoning ordinance which comprehended the entire city of Cincinnati, and under the authority of that case if the defendant in this case could justify his action under an ordinance that zoned the entire city of Athens he would be warranted in his refusal of a permit in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. City of Youngstown v. Kahn Bros. Building Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Powell v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Monroe CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Village of Waterbury v. MelendySupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Murdock v. Norwood, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1937
  5. Reid v. Architectural Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API