Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Norwood

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided September 28, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GORMAN, J.

This is an action to enjoin the city of Norwood from enforcing certain portions of the zoning ordinance of that city as they noy/ apply to certain property owned by the plaintiff at the intersection of Williams Avenue, Smith Road and Duck Creek road.

The particular property is now placed in a Residence “B” classification. Gasoline and filling stations under the Nor-wood Zoning Ordinance are prohibited in such a zone.

The zoning ordinance of Norwood was adopted on May 29, 1929, and at that time the property in question was placed in Residence “B” district. In June 1934 an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Matter of Eaton v. SweenyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. Redwine, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API