Legal Opinion

Powell v. Craig

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1925No. 18943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The Court of Appeals in this case, while finding that the construction, maintenance, and operation of a filling station was not a nuisance per se, found that it was a nuisance in this particular case by reason of its location in this exclusively residential district.

Since all nuisances, except nuisances per se, are such by reason of their proximity to other property, this court is confronted with the proposition of determining whether the invasion of an exclusively residential district by this class of business, not unlawful, either by statutory law, common law, or ordinance,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Antonik v. ChamberlainOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. CombsOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Widmer v. FrettiOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. State, Ex Rel. Sprigley v. WoodworthOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Adams v. GorrellOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API