Legal Opinion

Shurtleff v. City of Pikeville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 18, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court bt

Judge Bees

Affirming.

In 1920 one Draves made a plat of a small tract of land in the City of Pikeville, laying off the land into town lots and dividing them by streets and alleys. The plat was recorded in the Pike County Clerk’s office. The property platted is known as Cline Addition No. 3, and adjoins Cline Addition No. 2 which had been platted by another owner. The streets and alleys running east and west, designated on the plat of Cline Addition No. 3, are extensions of streets and alleys designated on the plat of Cline Addition No. 2. The lots were sold with reference…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Niagara Falls v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Osterweil v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Beale v. Town of Takoma ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Morrow v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. City of Henderson v. YeamanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hofgesang v. Woodbine Avenue Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  2. City of Hazard v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  3. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API