Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 1993No. 90-3886LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

Introduction

Plaintiff filed a Fifth Amendment inverse condemnation takings claim in the United States Claims Court1 on October 29,1990, seeking $5 million as just compensation for property damage and the cost of preventative measures stemming from the construction of the Smithland Locks and Dam project by the Army Corps of Engineers on the Ohio River. He argues that the construction of said dam altered the flow of the Ohio River, thereby causing erosion and damage to both his Cumberland Island and Smithland properties. Trial was held on April 1 and 2, 1992, in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Pacetti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API