Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
It is common legal knowledge that the filing of an affidavit and bond results in the perfunctory issuance of a writ of garnishment, before judgment, in a suit for a debt. Since 1893, the affidavit only need be couched in the statutory language that “. . . such debt is just, due and unpaid, and that the garnishment applied for is not sued out to injure either the defendant or the garnishee.” Laws of 1893, ch. 56, § 1; RCW 7.33.010 (1) (b).
This case challenges that procedure. The major question is whether the prejudgment garnishment of a corporation’s bank account without prior notice and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- State v. BartholomewWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.