Legal Opinion
Gottesfeld v. Mechanics & Traders Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 12, 1961No. Appeal, No. 215PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Flood, J.,
In this case the question before us is whether a loss suffered by the plaintiff was covered by the insurance policy issued to him by the defendant.
The plaintiff is a furrier. Late in March, 1955, one LaRosa entered into an agreement with the plaintiff for the delivery of furs to LaRosa on consignment for sale to his customers. The furs were to be returned within forty-eight hours if not sold by LaRosa. If the furs were sold, LaRosa was to pay for them within forty-eight hours at the prices fixed in the consignment memorandum.
During the month following the agreement, there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Thomas v. KesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. CavanaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Champion v. Chicago Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lou Ann Merkle v. Upper Dublin School District Upper Dublin Township Police Department Margaret Thomas Clair Brown, Jr., Dr. Jack Hahn, DetectiveCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- John J. Cenna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Northcraft v. Edward C. Michener Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.