Legal Opinion

John J. Cenna v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 25, 1968No. 17154PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim cognizable under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)) and for lack of jurisdiction to entertain it under the Tucker Act (28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (2)) because the claim is in excess of $10,000. Since the question on appeal is only whether, if appellant proves what he alleges to be true, he will state a valid claim cognizable in the district courts, we will assume for such purpose that the material allegations of the complaint are true.

Acco…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Gottesfeld v. Mechanics & Traders InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. MacKay v. Benjamin Franklin R. & H. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. McDermott v. Party City Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation v. The York Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. D & G Equipment Co., Inc. v. The First National Bank of Greencastle, Pa. v. Georgion, Roger L., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Namekagon Development Co. v. Bois Forte Reservation Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API