Reynick v. Aldington & Curtis Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Gage, J. Assumpsit by Charles J. Reynick against the Allington & Curtis Manufacturing Company for breach of a contract of employment. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff commenced work for defendants in 1900, and worked continuously to March 1, 1908. In December, 1908, and in the same month in 1909, he worked some by the day in the preparation of statements and the annual accounts. He was a stockholder, and one of five directors in the company. In the records of a meeting of the board of directors held December 30, 1909, appears the following:
“Board decided to employ Mr. C. J. Reynick, commencing January 1st, 1910, at a salary of $200 per month.”
Mr. Reynick commenced work January 1, 1910, and continued to work until in 1912. The minutes of a meeting…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tatterson v. Suffolk Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- United States Steel Corp. v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Barnes v. Spencer & Barnes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Township of Taymouth v. KoehlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wood & Brooks Co. v. D. E. Hewit Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Paxson v. Cass County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- White v. Simplex Radio Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Draper v. Village of SpringwellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- McIntyre v. Smith-Bridgman & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.