Barnes v. Spencer & Barnes Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by John E. Barnes against the Spencer & Barnes Company for money had and received. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff sued defendant in an action of trespass on the case upon promises, and gave notice that upon the trial under the money counts he would give in evidence certain notes. One of them was for |1,000, payable to Mrs. J. E. Barnes, guardian, etc., and was dated July 1, 1903. It had on the back of it the indorsement:
“ Pay to the order of J. E. Barnes, Mrs. J. E. Barnes, guardian.”
*511It also had 11 indorsements showing the interest had been paid up to July 1,1908, and 9 indorsements showing payments upon the principal. One of the notes was for $5,000, dated January 1, 1904, payable to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- United States Steel Corp. v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Hartley v. . Pioneer Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Redhead v. Iowa National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Fort Payne Rolling Mill v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Epstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Spencer v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Allied Supermarkets, Inc. v. Grocer's Dairy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Polish American Publishing Co. v. WojcikMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Veeser v. Robinson Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.