Legal Opinion

Township of Taymouth v. Koehler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1876PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Saginaw Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, J.:

Koehler brought an action of assumpsit against the township to recover the value of certain iron, furnished to be used in the construction of a bridge, under a written agreement made with one of the commissioners of highways of said township.

Several questions were raised and discussed relating, first, to the authority of said commissioners of highways to authorize *24the making of the contract in question, which it was said depended upon the regularity and validity of a special meeting of the people of the town called to vote moneys to build this bridge; second, as to whether the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. United States v. FillebrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Moser v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Athearn v. Independent District of MillersburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Wolf v. Aero Factors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. City of Wichita v. Old Colony Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Rondot v. Rogers Tp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API