Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Smith-Bridgman & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1942No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 41,786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

Prior to about March 1, 1935, plaintiff was employed by Caswell, Inc., as manager of its branch retail household appliance store in the city of Flint. On about March 1, 1935, Caswell, Inc., sold its Flint store to defendant. At the time of such sale plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral contract whereby plaintiff was employed as manager of the household appliance department of defendant’s store at a salary of $2,000 per year, payable in semimonthly instalments of $83.33, plus 3 per cent, commission on the net sales of such department. The transactions for the purchase of the store by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tatterson v. Suffolk Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Smalley v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Sines v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Epstean v. MintzMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hudson v. Columbian Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sloan v. Warren Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Rowe v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API