Just v. Littlefield
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment- of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered April 18, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for malpractice.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
During the latter part of 1912, respondent, Mrs. Just, was suffering some physical ailment, and for a time was treated by a Dr. Dawson. She did not improve as she desired, and a lady osteopathist, rooming at the apartment house of which respondents had charge, recommended the appellant as a physician, and took Mrs. Just to consult him on about January 25 or 26, 1913. Appellant examined her and diagnosed her ailment as cystic tumors. Mrs. Just *301testified that she informed appellant that Dr. Dawson had diagnosed her case as pregnancy. Appellant was positive, she says, that the trouble was cystic…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State v. PeeplesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Lane v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
- Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Brewer v. . Ring and ValkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Dishman v. Northern Pacific Beneficial Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Hansen v. SandvikWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Peddicord v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.