Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Sandvik

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1924No. 17925PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

Respondents sued appellants for damages by reason of physical injuries to the respondent wife, in the sum of $3,000, for loss of service and medical services in the sum of $700, and damages to their Ford delivery truck in the sum of $150, resulting from a collision between their truck and appellants’ Scripps-Booth automobile. Several acts of omission and commission on the part of the appellant husband in driving the ear of appellants, both under the law generally and the city ordinances, were alleged as grounds of recovery.

Appellants answered by general denials and affirmatively pleaded…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Akin v. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Eskildsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Thoresen v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Howe v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Randa v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Wold v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API