Legal Opinion

Brewer v. . Ring and Valk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1919PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs sought to recover damages for malpractice of defendants, physicians and surgeons, in wrongly and negligently diagnosing the feme plaintiff's pregnancy as a case of fibroid tumor of the uterus or an ovarian tumor. There was much evidence taken at the trial upon the questions of negligence and damages as to each of the two defendants, and the jury returned the following verdict:

"Were the plaintiffs injured by the negligence or want of skill of the defendants, or either of them? Answer: `No.'"

There were two other issues as to the damages each of the plaintiffs was entitled to recover,…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. State v. MoxleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  5. Pretzfelder v. Merchants Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API