Legal Opinion
Wangen v. Knudson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1988No. 15723, 15740 and 15743PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUCKER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Darrell K. Wangen (Wangen), appeals from a trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for new trial unless Wangen accepted a reduction in the amount of punitive damages awarded by the jury. Defendants, David R. Knudson (Knudson), Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (Northwestern Bell), Joe Elmore (Elmore), and U.S. West Direct (U.S. West) have filed notices of review alleging that the trial court erred in denying their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdwt. Elmore and U.S. West also allege that the trial court gave…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Richard Williams v. The City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Brenda Payton v. Abbott Labs, Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. WeathersbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Timothy L. Moysis, Appellee/cross v. Dtg Datanet, Formerly Known as Futuristic, Inc., Formerly Doing Business as Computerland, Inc., Appellant/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.