Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1995No. Nos. 94-3326SD, 94-3398SDPublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
The Governor and Attorney General of South Dakota (“the State”) appeal from a District Court1 ruling that the parental-notice provision of its abortion law is unconstitutional on its face because it fails to provide a bypass mechanism to allow mature and “best interest” minors to proceed with an abortion without notifying a parent. The State also appeals the District Court’s holding that its provisions for civil and criminal penalties for performing illegal abortions are unconstitutional because they lack a scienter requirement. In the alternative, the State…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Okpalobi v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Planned Parenthood Southeast Ohio Region v. DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Herbert Holmes, M.D. v. John Farmer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Manning v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.