Legal Opinion

Marion v. Board of Education

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1893No. 15056PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents herein to approve and allow the demand of appellant Eunice D. Marion, as a teacher of the school department of the city of Oakland, for salary from July 31,1889, to and including the twenty-eighth day of February, 1890, for the sum of seven hundred dollars, and to compel the defendants to draw a warrant for the payment of said claim. Petitioner was nonsuited in the trial court upon the grounds, among others, that she was employed or elected by respondents as a teacher for a certain definite time, and.that period had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Abraham v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Leymel v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Main v. Claremont Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Taylor v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API