Legal Opinion · Dissent

DiGenova v. State Board of Education

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1962No. S. F. 20720Published

1Dissent

SCHAUER, J., Dissenting.

After detailed study of the record and the pertinent law in this case I am in accord with the scholarly and forthright opinion authored for the District Court of Appeal by Justice pro tempore Coakley, and concurred in by Presiding Justice Bray (Cal.App., 1961), 11 Cal.Rptr. 620, and by reference adopt it as explanatory of the reasons why I cannot join my associates in affirming the judgment of the superior court.

Although Justice Coakley’s opinion is fully adequate and impelling to the conclusions reached, it, of course, was written before the opinion of my associates.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API