Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 24, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*635Opinion op the Court by

Judge Sampson

Reversing.

The Commonwealth prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the Ohio circuit court holding demurrable an indictment charging the Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. with failing and neglecting to provide a convenient and suitable waiting room in its depot at Centertown and dismissing the indictment. The indictment in so far as necessary to an understanding of this case reads as follows :

“Accuse the defendant, Louisville and Nashville Eailroad Co.,, of the offense of failing, neglecting and refusing to provide convenient and suitable waiting room at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Stringer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API