Legal Opinion

Rudasill v. Rudasill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1920No. 8244PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grayson County ; Silas Hare, Judge. Action by Permalla C. Rudasill against Emanuel Rudasill and -others. From the judgment denying part of the relief sought, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant brought this suit against the appellee Emanuel Rudasill, who will be referred to as appellee, for divorce and an adjustment and settlement of their property rights. Thereafter, by an amended petition, their three sons, W. S., S.E., and Pearl Rudasill, who were claiming some of the personal property involved in the suit, were made parties defendant. The case was submitted to a jury on special issues, and upon their findings judgment was rendered denying the appellant's prayer for divorce and determining and fixing the rights of the parties to the property in controversy. No…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Gardner v. RundellTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Clark Loftus v. PearceTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Varley v. Nichols-Shepard Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Lindsay v. ClaymanTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Stubblefield v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API