Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Clayman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1952No. A-3652PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Griffin

On February 14, 1939, E. W. and Frances M. Lindsay were husband and wife and had been for a number of years. On that date a land sale contract was entered into between Houston Land & Trust Company and “Mrs. Frances M. Lindsay and husband E. W. Lindsay” whereby the Land Company agreed to sell to Mrs. Lindsay “for and in consideration of the sum of $950 to be paid by Mrs. Frances M. Lindsay out of her own separate fund * * * as her separate property and for her own separate use and estate” Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Brookline Addition to Houston, Harris County, Texas. This was an installment sales…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Nye v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rice v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1858

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hodge v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Jackson v. HernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Burton v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1964

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API