Legal Opinion

Smith v. Coolidge Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Cox. Thomas superior court. April 21, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtPish, C. J.

A minority stockholder in a private corporation may proceed in equity in behalf of himself and other stockholders against the corporation, its officers, and third persons in collusion with its officers, for fraud or acts ultra vires which operatb to injure or damage the property of the corporation; but in order to do so, it must be shown that the stockholder has acted promptly, and that he has made earnest *8effort to obtain redress at the hands of the directors and stockholders, or why it could not be done, or that it was not reasonable to require it. He must also show that he was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. SearcySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Steele Lumber Co. v. Laurens Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Bartow Lumber Co. v. EnwrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Colquitt v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King Manufacturing Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. Winter v. Southern Securities Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Wagner v. BiscoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Smyly v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Nussbaum v. NussbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API