Legal Opinion

Nussbaum v. Nussbaum

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1938No. 12432PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The petition is what is sometimes called a stockholders’ derivative or representative suit, brought on behalf of the plaintiffs and other stockholders similarly situated, to enforce for the Miller Manufacturing Company rights which it is asserted belong to that company by virtue of its ownership of a 49 per cent, stock interest in the Miller Hydro Company. The rights sought to be enforced are those connected with the right of the manufacturing company to have the refusal of the purchase of the other 51 per cent, of the hydro company’s stock, which 51 per cent, is owned by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Coolidge Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Peoples Bank v. Southern Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Easterby v. Southern G-F Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peeples v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Peeples v. Southern Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Mountain Manor Co. v. GreenoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Collins Glennville R. Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Nussbaum v. NussbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API