Wagner v. Biscoe
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The first question which we must determine is whether or not the non-resident corporation is an indispensable party to this action brought by a minority stockholder. In Colquitt v. Howard, 11 Ga. 556 (3), this question was decided on a very similar state of facts. In holding that the corporation was an essential party, this court said: “Persons exercising the corporate powers of a corporation may, in their character as trustees, be held liable in a court of chancery, for a fraudulent breach of trust; and a stockholder, in a case where the directors collude with others who…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelly v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Crumlish's Adm'r v. Shen. Val. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
- Steele Lumber Co. v. Laurens Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Greenwood v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- McClean v. BradleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Pelletier v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- King Manufacturing Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Hotz Ex Rel. Shareholders of Minyard-Waidner, Inc. v. MinyardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Kilburn v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.