Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Biscoe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1940No. 13317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The first question which we must determine is whether or not the non-resident corporation is an indispensable party to this action brought by a minority stockholder. In Colquitt v. Howard, 11 Ga. 556 (3), this question was decided on a very similar state of facts. In holding that the corporation was an essential party, this court said: “Persons exercising the corporate powers of a corporation may, in their character as trustees, be held liable in a court of chancery, for a fraudulent breach of trust; and a stockholder, in a case where the directors collude with others who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Crumlish's Adm'r v. Shen. Val. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Steele Lumber Co. v. Laurens Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Greenwood v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. McClean v. BradleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Pelletier v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. King Manufacturing Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. Hotz Ex Rel. Shareholders of Minyard-Waidner, Inc. v. MinyardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Kilburn v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API