Legal Opinion

Scott v. University of Michigan Athletic Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1908No. Calendar No. 22,452Published

Case by Frank W. Scott against the University of Michigan Athletic Association and others for personal injuries: On motion for retaxation of costs.

1Per curiam

This is a motion to retax costs in this court. Appellant procured from the stenographer a copy of the testimony given at the trial for the purpose of settling a bill of exceptions, and the clerk has taxed the cost thereof over the objection made by appellees that, because no application was made to the circuit judge for an order requiring the stenographer to furnish a transcript free of cost, the expense of such transcript is not taxable as costs. See Hayes v. Livingston, 35 Mich. 371; Maynard v. Vinton, 59 Mich. 156; Thurstin v. Luce, 61 Mich. 486; City of Grand Rapids v. Coit, 151 Mich.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Thurstin v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API