Maynard v. Vinton
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion for retaxation of costs.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
It appears that in settling the bill of exceptions in this cause it became necessary to use a copy of the steno*156grapher’s notes of the evidence taken on the trial. The counsel for appellants requested the circuit judge to make an order requiring the stenographer of the court (Kent circuit) to file a copy of the testimony and proceedings in the cause. The circuit judge refused to make such order, but at the same time stated that he could not settle said bill of exceptions without such notes and copies. Appellant’s counsel then caused such copies to be filed, and paid for them, or obligated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Bell v. PateMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. HaytMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by13 opinions
- Guaclides v. KruseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Bauer v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Jablonowski v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Segal v. Greater Valley Terminal Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.