Legal Opinion

Thurstin v. Luce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for retaxation of costs. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

■ The plaintiff, by his counsel, objects to the taxation of two items in the defendant’s bill of costs in this Court:

1. To $184.50, charged for stenographer’s copy of testimony used in the making and settlement of bill of exceptions.

2. To $46.65, claimed and taxed by the clerk at $42.95, for copy of record for printer.

In regard to the first item, it appears that no application was made to the judge of the superior court of the city of Grand Rapids, for an order requiring the official stenographer of that court to make and file a copy of his notes of the testimony, under How. Stat. § 6590,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maynard v. VintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Scott v. University of Michigan Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API