City of Grand Rapids v. Coit
Michigan Supreme Court
Proceedings by the city of Grand Rapids against Clara M. Coit and others to condemn land for street purposes: On motion for a retaxation of costs.
1Per curiam
This cause on appeal to this court was reversed with costs to the respondents and appellants. 149 Mich. 668. In the taxed bill of costs was an item of $108.96, stenographer’s fees for testimony taken upon the trial. This item was taxed by the clerk in favor of the appellants. An appeal was taken from that taxation to *110this court and the item excluded on November 7, 1907, because counsel for the respondents had not complied with section 644, 1 Comp. Laws, and therefore were not entitled to tax this item. Thurston v. Luce, 61 Mich. 488.
On December 12th thereafter, the respondents presented a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Cox v. GressSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Thurstin v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Band v. Livonia AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Cranston v. StanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Hughes v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Losie v. LosieMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.