State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Veith
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, we find that since he knowingly and willfully transferred and commingled client trust funds with funds in his and his associated lawyers’ law office business account, and because he misappropriated some of those funds to his own use and to other improper purposes, Douglas Veith should be disbarred.
Specifically, we find that the record reveals by clear and convincing evidence that Veith violated his oath of office as an attorney and Canon 1, DR 1-102, and Canon 9, DR 9-102, of the lawyers’ Code of Professional Responsibility. We agree with the relator,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Waysman v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- The Florida Bar v. BreedSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- STATE EX REL. STATE BAR v. VeithNebraska Supreme Court · 1991