State v. Motl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT, Justice.
In State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901 (Minn.1983), we held in part that a prior *665misdemeanor DWI conviction based on an uncounseled guilty plea cannot be used to convert a subsequent DWI offense into a gross misdemeanor under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3 (1982) absent a valid waiver of counsel on the record of the prior proceeding. In Nordstrom there was no record. In this case there was a record but defendant contends that the record was inadequate to satisfy the requirements of Minn.R.Crim.P. 15.02 and 15.03 and prior cases of this court dealing with waiver of counsel. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Burt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Shackelford v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. EdmisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. SandmoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MedenwaldtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.