Legal Opinion

State v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1985No. C1-84-1697PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Respondent. Dale Stewart was charged with gross misdemeanor D.W.I., Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3(a) (Supp.1983) (second D.W.I. violation within five years). Following the omnibus hearing, the trial court ruled that respondent’s prior 1982 D.W.I. conviction could not be used to enhance the current charge because of an insufficient inquiry into the factual basis for the 1982 plea. The trial court then dismissed the gross misdemeanor charge and the State brought this pre-trial appeal pursuant to Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure 28.-04. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1982 at his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. MotlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. SandmoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Vernlund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. GrunewaldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API