Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Kuhn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1979No. 1-878-A-230PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Toni, Greg, and Mary Kuhn (children) appeal from an adverse judgment in favor of defendants-ap-pellees Charles and Glenola Kuhn.

We reverse.

In pertinent part, the trial court made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

1. That Clint N. Bowman was the owner of the following described real estate, to-wit:

That upon his death, pursuant to his last will and testament and the final decree in his estate, dated December 23, 1954, the defendant, Charles Wayne Kuhn, was devised a fee simple remainder interest in said real estate, the same to not vest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McClure v. RabenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Huffman v. ForemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Eissler v. HoppelIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McClure v. RabenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. Essex Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Carr v. DorenkamperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Gary D. Kent v. Cynthia KerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Carr v. DorenkamperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Carr v. DorenkamperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API