Legal Opinion

Eissler v. Hoppel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1902No. 19,726PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Vanderburgh Superior Court; J. H. Foster, Judge. Suit by Johanna Eissler against John Hoppel and others to contest a will. From a judgment for defendants on their answer, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Suit by appellant to contest the will of her mother, Lena Hoppel. The appellees, being the other heirs and beneficiaries under said will, answered that the plaintiff (appellant) had no interest in the estate of her mother and no right to maintain the action. Judgment on the answer for the appellees, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The substance of the answer is: That on the 21st of June, 1893, during the life time of her mother, a cause was pending in the Vanderburg Circuit Court, wherein the appellant and her husband were plaintiffs, and her mother, Lena Hoppel and other named beneficiaries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Crum v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Lawrence v. CockeTennessee Supreme Court · 1847

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Burrell v. JeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Gary D. Kent John David Kent and Kevin Kent, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Gary D. Kent Nicholas Kent and David Kent v. Cynthia KerrIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Indiana Department of Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division v. Estate of BinhackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API