Carr v. Dorenkamper
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentSullivan, Judge
I have no quarrel with the attempt by the majority to achieve a fair result by application of the doctrine of equitable assignment in the case before us. rectly stated by the majority, Indiana has long recognized the doctrine even with respect to an expectant interest. I further As cor-see no reason why the doctrine may not be applied to transfers of mortgage interests in real estate.
The problem with the case before us, however, is that, according to the majority, the transfer of Carr's interest in the fourth mortgage occurred by virtue of the quitclaim deed executed to Wernecke on March 27,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Enderle v. SharmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bryan v. UlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Dingman v. BoyleIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.