Legal Opinion

McClure v. Raben

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1893No. 16,149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, C. J.

This case is in this court for the second time. McClure v. Raben, 125 Ind. 139.

The cross-complaint of the appellee, which was adjudged insufficient, is fully set forth in the opinion in that case, and sets up, among other things, that Samuel D. McReynolds purchased from the appellant, during the lifetime of his mother, his expectant interest in the land described in such cross-complaint; that McReynolds paid the full value of such interest, and received from the appellant a quitclaim deed for such land; that the contract by which the appellant sold and conveyed to McReynolds his expectant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Boynton v. HubbardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  5. Test v. LarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hale v. HollonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hooker v. HookerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Gadsby v. GadsbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Mally v. MallySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API