Legal Opinion

State v. Omernick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The only question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the judgment and reopen the case under sec. 269.46 (1), Stats. The statute is not mandatory but places a judicial discretion upon the trial court to vacate a default judgment if the grounds for such vacation are shown. Paschong v. Hollenbeck (1961), 13 Wis. (2d) 415, 108 N. W. (2d) 668; Williams v. Miles (1955), 268 Wis. 632, 68 N. W. (2d) 451; Welfare Bldg. & Loan Asso. v. Breuer (1933), 213 Wis. 97, 250 N. W. 846.

The defendant argues the court abused its discretion because all formal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Welfare Building & Loan Ass'n v. BreuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Schwarz v. StracheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Williams v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Springaire Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API