Welfare Building & Loan Ass'n v. Breuer

The appellant claims that the court erred (1) in opening the default judgments and (2) in denying *101judgments for a deficiency against the respondents Praefke, and a judgment in the suit on the mortgage note against them.(1) As to the claim that the court erred in opening the judgment in the three cases and permitting the Praefkes to defend, it appears that in these cases, wherein summons was first served upon them, they took the papers to Har-graves and left to him the doing of whatever if anything was necessary for their protection; that he assured them he would take care of their interests…