Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Springaire Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1971No. 56, 57PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The hearing on applications for default judgments was held on November 3, 1969, more than sixty days after the expiration of the time for answering the complaints. The hearing was upon due notice. At the hearing the defendant asked for enlargement of the time in which to answer.

Sec. 269.45 (2), Stats., provides:

“After the expiration of the specified period . . . the court may in its discretion, for like cause, upon notice, extend the time where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect . . . .”

To show excusable neglect, Springaire’s attorney submitted identical affidavits in each…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Giese v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lawrence v. MacIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Miller v. BelangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bornemann v. City of New BerlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dugenske v. DugenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API