Legal Opinion
Packard Instrument Co. v. Reich
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 22, 1980No. 79-1403PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
Plaintiff, Packard Instrument Company, brings this interlocutory appeal from an order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction which sought to restrain defendants, Andrew R. Reich, Peter Mertens, Jr., and Radiomatic Instruments and Chemical Company, Inc., from selling certain scientific instruments.
Packard, a corporation, is involved in the invention, development, marketing, and manufacture of scientific instruments for the scientific research market. Reich and Mertens were employed by Packard until their resignations on October 1, 1978, and September 1, 1978, respectively. Upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Stigler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Victor Chemical Works v. IliffIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rao v. RaoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- MBL (USA) Corp. v. DiekmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Stampede Tool Warehouse, Inc. v. MayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Hayden's Sport Center, Inc. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Eaton Corp. v. Appliance Valves Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.