Legal Opinion

In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative Litigation

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 30, 2017No. 2:13-cv-02414-KJM-EFBPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*925ORDER

Kimberly Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE '

Shareholders have brought a derivative suit against a corporation’s directors for their allégedly deceitful and financially-destructive role in the 2008 housing collapse. Defendants are current and former JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorgan”) directors. Plaintiffs are California-based shareholders. Plaintiffs argue defendants breached their fiduciary duties, committed securities violations, and unjustly enriched themselves through defendants’ creation and sale of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”). The court granted…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. California State Teachers' Retirement System v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. Dauven v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
  3. Crittendon v. MULDROWDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. HPIL Holding, Inc. v. Haining ZhangDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Hayes v. RojasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API