Crittendon v. MULDROW
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AJEENAH CRITTENDON, et al., 10 Case No. 22-cv-09153-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 DISMISS, DENYING MOTION FOR ANGELICA MULDROW, ATTORNEY FEES, AND DENYING 13 MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant. 14 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 The parties here have filed three motions. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss under 18 Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that this action is barred by res judicata. Prior to this, Plaintiffs filed a 19 motion for attorney fees relating to Defendant’s previously filed (and denied) anti-SLAPP…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- John Pochiro and Karen Pochiro, Husband and Wife v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Community State Bank v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.