Legal Opinion
Levy v. Senate of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 16, 2014PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
This Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)1 case, which involves a journalist’s request for legislative records2 relating to the legal representation of Senate Democratic Caucus employees, is before us following a remand from our Supreme .Court in Levy v. Senate of Pennsylvania, 619 Pa. 586, 65 A.3d 361 (2013) (Levy). In Levy, the Supreme Court affirmed our decision3 regarding the applicability of the attorney-client privilege to client identities and descriptions of legal services; however, it reversed our decision to the extent we determined additional bases for nondisclosure…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Sepulveda, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- PA Dept. of Ed. v. R. Bagwell PSU v. R. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Township of Worcester v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Bagwell v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.