Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Office of Open Records

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 2013No. 20 MAP 2011PublishedCited by 307 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

We granted allowance of appeal in this case under the Right-to-Know Law (“RTKL”), Act of February 14, 2008, P.L. 6, 65 P.S. §§ 67.101-67.3104, to determine the standard and scope of review that apply when a court reviews a final determination of the Office of Open Records (the “OOR” or “Appellant”).

Background of “Right-to-Know” Legislation in Pennsylvania

The RTKL, which became effective on January 1, 2009, is the statute providing for access to public records in Pennsylvania. It was preceded by the Act of June 21, 1957, P.L. 390, as amended, 65 P.S. §§ 66.1-66.9,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. EmerickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by307 opinions

  1. McGowan v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In Re: Vencil, N. Appeal of: PA State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Banfield, Aplts. v. Secretary of the ComSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. PA State Police, Aplt. v. Grove, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

302 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API