Ruocco v. Logiocco
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The complaint substantially follows that in the Practice Book, p. 437, entitled “Seduction” (Form 266), and charges the defendant with debauching the plaintiff’s daughter with resulting pregnancy and birth of a child. The defendant made what amounted to a general denial of the entire complaint, and then alleged by way of “Special Defense,” in effect the following: that on June 15th, 1923, in an action for bastardy in the Court of Common Pleas for New Haven County, this defendant was found not guilty of the charge there made, of being the father of the child so born to the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Kline v. BeebeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. SegerbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.